CR 278 Searcy over BEAR CREEK


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CR 278 Searcy over BEAR CREEK
Structure number:000000000016758
Location:0.04 W SH 27
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:119.1 ft. [36.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:9.5 ft. [2.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:10.8 ft. [3.3 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1971
Year reconstructed:2011
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:10 [as of 1987]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Sufficiency rating:18.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$341,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
October 2018PoorGoodPoorFair1018.4
October 2017PoorGoodPoorFair1018.4
October 2016PoorGoodPoorFair1018.4
October 2015PoorGoodPoorPoor1018.4
October 2014PoorGoodPoorPoor1018.4
October 2013PoorGoodPoorPoor1018.4
April 2012PoorVery GoodPoorPoor1018.4
September 2011PoorVery GoodPoorPoor1018.4
October 2010PoorPoorPoorPoor1013.0
October 2009PoorPoorPoorPoor1013.0
November 2008PoorPoorPoorPoor1013.0
August 2007PoorPoorPoorPoor1013.0
August 2006PoorFairPoorPoor1017.0
August 2005PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoor1018.4
August 2004PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoor1018.4
August 2003PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoor1018.4
August 2002PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoor1018.4
August 2001PoorSatisfactoryPoorPoor1018.4
July 2000PoorGoodPoorPoor1018.4
August 1999PoorVery GoodFairPoor1018.4
July 1998PoorVery GoodFairPoor1018.4
July 1997PoorPoorFairPoor1013.0
June 1996PoorPoorFairPoor1013.0
June 1995PoorPoorFairPoor1013.8
June 1994PoorPoorFairPoor1013.8
June 1993PoorPoorFairPoor1013.8
May 1992PoorPoorFairPoor1013.8
May 1991PoorPoorFairPoor1013.8