CR 195/HARVEY OWL over WEST FORK WHITE RIVER
This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.
Map
Coordinates:
+36.05353, -94.0831136°03'13" N, 94°04'59" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR 195/HARVEY OWL over WEST FORK WHITE RIVER |
Structure number: | 000000000017367 |
Location: | 0.67 NO OF SH 16 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 120.1 ft. [36.6 m] |
Total length: | 173.9 ft. [53.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Vertical clearance above deck: | 10.5 ft. [3.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1926 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2012
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 45 [as of 1987] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 14.9 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 45 | 14.9 |
November 2011 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 45 | 14.9 |
November 2010 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Fair | 45 | 14.9 |
October 2009 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
November 2008 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
December 2007 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
January 2007 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
February 2006 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
March 2005 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
February 2003 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
March 2002 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
January 2001 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
March 1999 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
March 1998 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
March 1996 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
March 1995 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
January 1994 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Poor | 45 | 0.0 |
February 1993 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 45 | 0.0 |
February 1991 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 45 | 0.0 |