Mickles Switch Rd over Achmun Creek
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Mickles Switch Rd over Achmun Creek |
Structure number: | 000000000017743 |
Location: | 0.45 MI E JCT SH 10 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Total length: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 13.8 ft. [4.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1920 |
Year reconstructed: | 1989 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [3] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 47 [as of 1987] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 24.6 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $220,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 47 | 24.6 |
March 2017 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 47 | 24.6 |
March 2016 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 47 | 24.6 |
February 2015 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 47 | 24.8 |
March 2013 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 47 | 24.8 |
March 2011 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 47 | 24.8 |
March 2010 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 47 | 24.8 |
March 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 47 | 24.8 |
April 2007 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 47 | 24.8 |
April 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 47 | 25.8 |
April 2005 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Serious | 47 | 23.9 |
April 2004 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Serious | 47 | 23.9 |
April 2003 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Serious | 47 | 23.9 |
June 2002 | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | Poor | 47 | 23.9 |
January 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 47 | 80.0 |
February 1999 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 47 | 80.0 |
March 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 47 | 80.0 |
March 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 47 | 80.0 |
February 1993 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 47 | 80.0 |
February 1991 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 47 | 66.6 |