Share:

CR 8 IZARD over E. LAFFERTY CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.93889, -91.78806
35°56'20" N, 91°47'17" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CR 8 IZARD over E. LAFFERTY CREEK
Structure number:000000000019909
Location:2.5 MI SE SH 69
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Total length:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1985
Year reconstructed:1991
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Orthotropic [08]
Deck type:Steel plate (includes orthotropic) [5]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:20 [as of 1987]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:37.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$46,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2017FairFairFairSatisfactory2037.0
February 2016FairFairFairSatisfactory2037.0
February 2015FairFairFairSatisfactory2037.0
February 2014FairFairFairSatisfactory2037.0
February 2013FairFairFairSatisfactory2037.0
February 2012FairFairFairSatisfactory2037.0
February 2011FairFairFairSatisfactory2037.0
February 2010FairFairFairSatisfactory2037.0
February 2009FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory2038.0
February 2008FairSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory2038.0
April 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2040.3
March 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2040.3
January 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2040.3
January 2002FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2040.3
January 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2040.3
February 2000FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2040.3
January 1998FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2040.3
January 1997FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2040.3
January 1996FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2040.3
January 1995FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2040.3
January 1994FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2045.0
January 1993FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2045.0
January 1992FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory2045.0