CR10/Cleburne Co. over BEAVER CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR10/Cleburne Co. over BEAVER CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000020059 |
Location: | .55 NO JCT SH 25 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Total length: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 12.8 ft. [3.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.8 ft. [4.5 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1981 |
Year reconstructed: | 1997 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 49 [as of 1987] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 56.8 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $226,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 49 | 56.8 |
October 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 65.2 |
October 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 65.2 |
October 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 54.7 |
October 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 54.7 |
October 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 54.7 |
October 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 54.7 |
October 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 54.7 |
October 2002 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 54.5 |
October 2000 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 54.5 |
October 1998 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 54.5 |
October 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 52.5 |
October 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 52.5 |
November 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 59.6 |
December 1990 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 49 | 59.6 |