ConnieBrooks IZARD over MILL CREEK


+36.45508, -91.50288
36°27'18" N, 91°30'10" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:ConnieBrooks IZARD over MILL CREEK
Structure number:000000000020242
Location:.25 MI NO SH 69
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Total length:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1984
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:16 [as of 1987]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:41.9 tons [38.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:82.0

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
February 201582.0Good7 out of 10-16
February 201382.0Good7 out of 10-16
January 201182.0Good7 out of 10-16
January 200982.0Good7 out of 10-16
February 200782.0Good7 out of 10-16
February 200582.0Good7 out of 10-16
January 200381.7Good7 out of 10-16
January 200181.7Good7 out of 10-16
February 199981.7Good7 out of 10-16
February 199781.7Good7 out of 10-16
January 199581.7Good7 out of 10-16
February 199381.7Good7 out of 10-16
January 199178.4Good7 out of 10-16