CR 711 HAISLIP RD over CANEY CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CR 711 HAISLIP RD over CANEY CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000020463 |
Location: | 0.37 MI E OF SH 301 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Total length: | 124.0 ft. [37.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1984 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 33 [as of 1987] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 72.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2017 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 33 | 72.7 |
July 2015 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 33 | 72.7 |
July 2013 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 33 | 72.7 |
October 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 33 | 55.2 |
October 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 33 | 54.2 |
October 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 33 | 54.2 |
January 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 33 | 54.2 |
January 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 33 | 54.0 |
February 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 33 | 54.0 |
January 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 33 | 54.0 |
July 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 33 | 54.0 |
July 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 33 | 54.1 |
April 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 33 | 54.1 |
May 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 33 | 54.1 |