Share:

Cr-239/Z-D/L-7.86 over Ditch

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Cr-239/Z-D/L-7.86 over Ditch
Structure number:000000000020813
Location:3 North Of Jct Cr 135 & 9
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:36.4 ft. [11.1 m]
Total length:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1988
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Orthotropic [08]
Deck type:Steel plate (includes orthotropic) [5]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:25 [as of 1987]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:84.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$293,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
May 2018FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood2584.5
May 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood2584.5
May 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood2571.8
May 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood2571.8
May 2013FairSatisfactoryGoodGood2571.8
June 2012GoodGoodGoodGood2571.8
June 2011GoodGoodGoodGood2571.8
May 2010GoodGoodGoodGood2571.8
April 2009GoodGoodGoodGood2571.8
April 2008GoodGoodGoodGood2571.8
May 2007GoodGoodGoodGood2571.8
April 2006GoodGoodGoodGood2571.8
April 2005GoodGoodGoodGood2571.8
April 2004GoodGoodGoodGood2571.8
May 2003GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
April 2002GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
May 2001GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
June 2000GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
May 1999GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
May 1998GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
May 1997GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
May 1996GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
June 1995GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
May 1994GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
May 1993GoodGoodGoodGood2571.5
May 1992GoodGoodGoodGood2573.3
April 1991GoodGoodGoodGood2573.3