HOLLOWELL DRIVE over SULPHUR CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | HOLLOWELL DRIVE over SULPHUR CREEK |
Structure number: | 000000000021033 |
Location: | .09 MI SOUTH SH 110 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Total length: | 57.1 ft. [17.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 23.6 ft. [7.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1991 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 70 [as of 1987] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 96.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
October 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 70 | 96.0 |
October 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 96.0 |
October 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 96.0 |
November 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 96.0 |
October 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 76.7 |
November 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 76.7 |
October 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 76.7 |
October 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 76.5 |
October 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 76.5 |
October 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 76.5 |
October 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 76.5 |
October 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 75.5 |
October 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 75.5 |
October 1991 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 70 | 75.5 |