Share: 
Col.CO. rd. 58 Z:D over Beech creek
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | Col.CO. rd. 58 Z:D over Beech creek |
| Structure number: | 000000000022648 |
| Location: | 1.54 mi W Jct.69 & 58 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Total length: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 21.7 ft. [6.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.7 ft. [6.6 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2003 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 248 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 62.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 248 | 62.9 |
| July 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 248 | 62.9 |
| July 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 248 | 62.9 |
| April 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 248 | 59.6 |
| April 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 248 | 59.6 |
| April 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 248 | 59.6 |
| April 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 248 | 59.6 |
| May 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 248 | 59.6 |
| May 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 248 | 59.6 |
| April 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Very Good | 248 | 59.4 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1025174
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1025174