Share: 
Cleburne CR 95 over BIG CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | Cleburne CR 95 over BIG CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000022837 |
| Location: | 2.85 mi. SW SH 87 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
| Total length: | 52.2 ft. [15.9 m] |
| Skew angle: | 15° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2004 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 5 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 49 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 91.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2017 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 49 | 91.0 |
| April 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 49 | 91.0 |
| April 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 49 | 76.7 |
| June 2012 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 49 | 76.7 |
| July 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 49 | 76.7 |
| July 2008 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 49 | 76.7 |
| July 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 49 | 76.7 |
| July 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 49 | 76.7 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1025353
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1025353