Share: 
Columbia CR78 Z-E over Big Creek Relief
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | Columbia CR78 Z-E over Big Creek Relief |
| Structure number: | 000000000023083 |
| Location: | 0.5 mi E jct 29 & 78 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
| Total length: | 62.0 ft. [18.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2007 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 140 [as of 1987] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 91.5 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 140 | 91.5 |
| January 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 140 | 91.5 |
| January 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 140 | 91.5 |
| February 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 140 | 91.5 |
| January 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 140 | 85.5 |
| February 2007 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 140 | 85.5 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1025593
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1025593