Share: 
US 70 SEC.04-10.35 over SELF CREEK(LAKE GREESON)
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | US 70 SEC.04-10.35 over SELF CREEK(LAKE GREESON) |
| Structure number: | 0000000000A0285 |
| Location: | WEST OF DAISY, ARK |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
| Length of largest span: | 200.1 ft. [61.0 m] |
| Total length: | 692.0 ft. [210.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.5 ft. [9.6 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1949 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,700 [as of 2014] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 65.6 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,702,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2017 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1700 | 65.6 |
| July 2015 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1600 | 65.9 |
| August 2013 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1600 | 65.9 |
| July 2013 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1800 | 65.4 |
| July 2011 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1800 | 65.4 |
| November 2009 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1800 | 65.4 |
| October 2007 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2000 | 64.9 |
| October 2005 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2300 | 66.9 |
| December 2003 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2300 | 66.6 |
| September 2002 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2300 | 66.6 |
| July 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1900 | 69.7 |
| June 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1900 | 67.7 |
| May 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1095 | 64.3 |
| October 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1095 | 69.1 |
| December 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1095 | 69.1 |
| December 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1095 | 69.1 |
| November 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1095 | 69.1 |
| July 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1595 | 68.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 304 | 301 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 19,128 | 17,603 | 803 | 722 | 0 |
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Arch | linear ft. | 1,000 | 976 | 22 | 2 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 62 | 31 | 30 | 1 | 0 |
| Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 66 | 60 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 219 | 219 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 70 | 70 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bearings | ||||||
| Movable Bearing | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Fixed Bearing | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 1,080 | 1,074 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 1,173 | 1,073 | 100 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1025819
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1025819