SH 28 over BIG CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 28 over BIG CREEK |
Structure number: | 0000000000M0702 |
Location: | 0.55 E OF SH 27 @ ROVER |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Total length: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 26.2 ft. [8.0 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1959 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,200 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 77.2 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1200 | 77.2 |
May 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1200 | 70.6 |
April 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1200 | 70.6 |
May 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1700 | 70.3 |
May 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1700 | 70.3 |
April 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1700 | 70.3 |
May 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1500 | 57.3 |
May 2004 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 1400 | 57.4 |
April 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1400 | 57.2 |
April 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1400 | 57.2 |
May 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 1400 | 57.2 |
June 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 655 | 64.0 |
June 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 655 | 63.0 |
June 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 655 | 63.0 |
June 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 972 | 57.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 217 | 217 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 744 | 744 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 744 | 694 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Masonry Abutment | linear ft. | 52 | 0 | 52 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 60 | 59 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 62 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 186 | 0 | 186 | 0 | 0 |