SH 54-06 LM 1.08 over Sanders Creek Relief
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 54-06 LM 1.08 over Sanders Creek Relief |
Structure number: | 0000000000M1013 |
Location: | 1.08 Mi N SH 114-Glendale |
Purpose: | Carries highway over relief for waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Total length: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Precast Panels [2] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 490 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 68.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 490 | 68.8 |
December 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1300 | 73.6 |
November 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1300 | 58.2 |
December 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1100 | 58.3 |
January 2011 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1100 | 58.3 |
February 2009 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1100 | 58.3 |
April 2007 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1100 | 58.3 |
August 2005 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1100 | 58.3 |
July 2003 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 730 | 64.3 |
August 2001 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 870 | 48.1 |
July 1999 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 870 | 48.1 |
July 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 295 | 66.4 |
July 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 295 | 65.4 |
July 1993 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 295 | 55.4 |
September 1991 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 716 | 63.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 217 | 217 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 806 | 806 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Timber Abutment | linear ft. | 56 | 56 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Timber Pile | each | 10 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 56 | 50 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 62 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 |