Share: 
US 65 Searcy over DITCH
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | US 65 Searcy over DITCH |
| Structure number: | 0000000000M1185 |
| Location: | 5.56 MI E NEWTON CO LN |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
| Length of largest span: | 11.2 ft. [3.4 m] |
| Total length: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1930 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 4,700 [as of 2014] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 82.4 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2017 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4700 | 82.4 |
| October 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4500 | 82.8 |
| October 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4500 | 68.3 |
| October 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4600 | 68.1 |
| October 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4600 | 68.1 |
| October 2008 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4600 | 68.1 |
| October 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5000 | 67.1 |
| October 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4900 | 67.4 |
| October 2002 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 4900 | 67.2 |
| October 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5000 | 66.9 |
| November 1998 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 5000 | 64.9 |
| December 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2220 | 71.4 |
| October 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2220 | 71.4 |
| October 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2220 | 71.4 |
| October 1990 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 2886 | 69.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 99 | 0 | 98 | 1 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 64 | 64 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 192 | 192 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1027531
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1027531