SH 98 S-2 LM 1.65 over HOLLIS CREEK

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	SH 98 S-2 LM 1.65 over HOLLIS CREEK
Structure number:	0000000000M1719
Location:	1.65 MI E JCT US 79 & 98
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	28.9 ft. `[8.8 m]`
Total length:	30.8 ft. `[9.4 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	24.3 ft. `[7.4 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	25.3 ft. `[7.7 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1933
Year reconstructed:	1965
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Main span material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main span design:	Channel beam `[22]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	220 `[as of 2014]`
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. `[5]`
Pier/abutment protection:	Navigation protection not required `[1]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	50.6

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
January 2018	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	220	50.6
January 2017	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	220	50.6
January 2016	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	290	49.0
January 2015	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	290	49.0
January 2014	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	220	50.6
January 2013	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	220	50.6
January 2012	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	220	53.4
January 2011	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	220	53.4
January 2010	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	220	53.4
January 2009	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	250	53.3
January 2008	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	250	55.1
January 2007	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	250	55.1
January 2006	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	190	65.1
January 2005	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	190	65.1
January 2003	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	340	60.4
February 2002	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	340	60.4
January 2001	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	330	60.4
January 2000	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	330	60.4
February 1999	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	330	60.4
February 1998	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	330	60.4
January 1997	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	110	65.0
February 1996	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	110	65.0
January 1995	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	110	65.0
February 1994	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	110	65.0
February 1993	Good	Good	Good	Good	110	65.0
January 1991	Good	Good	Good	Good	320	59.9

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	124	124	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	248	248	0	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange	sq. ft.	781	781	0	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	56	34	10	12	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	62	62	0	0	0