SH 377 Searcy over GOURD CREEK

This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.

Map

Coordinates:
+35.88405, -92.83065
35°53'03" N, 92°49'50" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	SH 377 Searcy over GOURD CREEK
Structure number:	0000000000M3003
Location:	2.1MI SO. JCT SH 74
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Major Collector (Rural) `[07]`
Length of largest span:	23.0 ft. `[7.0 m]`
Total length:	50.9 ft. `[15.5 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	20.7 ft. `[6.3 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	23.6 ft. `[7.2 m]`
Skew angle:	45°
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1940
Historic significance:	Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places `[1]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Steel `[3]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	350 `[as of 2015]`
Truck traffic:	7% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. `[5]`
Pier/abutment protection:	Navigation protection not required `[1]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. `[5]`
Sufficiency rating:	43.0
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$53,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
September 2016	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	350	43.0
September 2015	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	350	43.0
September 2014	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	230	47.0
October 2013	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	250	46.8
October 2012	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	190	47.2
October 2011	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	190	47.2
October 2010	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	190	47.2
October 2009	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	190	47.2
November 2008	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	230	47.0
November 2007	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	240	21.6
November 2006	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	240	21.6
November 2005	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	300	15.4
November 2004	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	300	15.4
December 2003	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	240	21.6
December 2002	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	240	21.6
December 2001	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	260	16.4
December 2000	Fair	Good	Fair	Fair	260	16.4
October 1999	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	260	16.4
December 1998	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	260	16.4
December 1996	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	120	23.8
October 1995	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	120	21.9
November 1994	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	120	21.9
October 1993	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	120	21.9
November 1992	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Fair	120	21.9
October 1991	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	143	21.4