Share:

SH 377 Searcy over GOURD CREEK

This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.

Map

Coordinates:
+35.88405, -92.83065
35°53'03" N, 92°49'50" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SH 377 Searcy over GOURD CREEK
Structure number:0000000000M3003
Location:2.1MI SO. JCT SH 74
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Total length:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.7 ft. [6.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Skew angle:45°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:350 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:43.0
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$53,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
September 2016FairGoodFairFair35043.0
September 2015FairGoodFairFair35043.0
September 2014FairGoodFairFair23047.0
October 2013FairGoodFairFair25046.8
October 2012FairGoodFairFair19047.2
October 2011FairGoodFairFair19047.2
October 2010FairGoodFairFair19047.2
October 2009FairGoodFairFair19047.2
November 2008FairGoodFairFair23047.0
November 2007FairGoodFairFair24021.6
November 2006FairGoodFairFair24021.6
November 2005FairGoodFairFair30015.4
November 2004FairGoodFairFair30015.4
December 2003FairGoodFairFair24021.6
December 2002FairGoodFairFair24021.6
December 2001FairGoodFairFair26016.4
December 2000FairGoodFairFair26016.4
October 1999FairGoodSatisfactoryFair26016.4
December 1998FairGoodSatisfactoryFair26016.4
December 1996FairGoodSatisfactoryFair12023.8
October 1995FairGoodSatisfactoryFair12021.9
November 1994FairGoodSatisfactoryFair12021.9
October 1993FairGoodSatisfactoryFair12021.9
November 1992FairGoodSatisfactoryFair12021.9
October 1991FairGoodGoodFair14321.4