SH 98 S-3 LM 6.06 over CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 98 S-3 LM 6.06 over CREEK |
Structure number: | 0000000000X0130 |
Location: | 6.07 MI S JCT US 82 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 47.9 ft. [14.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1971 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 88.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 200 | 88.5 |
March 2016 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 170 | 88.5 |
March 2014 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 170 | 87.1 |
March 2012 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 150 | 87.1 |
March 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 150 | 87.1 |
March 2008 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 160 | 87.1 |
April 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 210 | 87.1 |
April 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 160 | 87.1 |
April 2002 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 180 | 86.8 |
April 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 200 | 86.8 |
April 1998 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 200 | 86.8 |
May 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 95 | 76.5 |
April 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 95 | 97.0 |
May 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 95 | 97.0 |
April 1990 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 192 | 96.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 96 | 96 | 0 | 0 | 0 |