Share: 
SH 90-02- LM 7.63 over DRAINAGE DITCH
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | SH 90-02- LM 7.63 over DRAINAGE DITCH |
| Structure number: | 0000000000X1198 |
| Location: | 1.4 MI SE OF BOYDSVILLE |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Total length: | 53.2 ft. [16.2 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 2004 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 750 [as of 2014] |
| Truck traffic: | 13% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | None present but re-evaluation suggested [5] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 84.5 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| July 2018 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 750 | 84.5 |
| July 2016 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 810 | 84.4 |
| August 2014 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 810 | 89.8 |
| August 2012 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 830 | 89.8 |
| August 2010 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 830 | 89.8 |
| August 2008 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 830 | 89.8 |
| August 2006 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 820 | 89.8 |
| September 2004 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 750 | 89.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 248 | 215 | 26 | 7 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1029752
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1029752