IRR BIA RTE 3 over KELLY GULCH
Map
Coordinates:
+33.15938, -110.4083833°09'34" N, 110°24'30" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | IRR BIA RTE 3 over KELLY GULCH |
Structure number: | 00000000000H173 |
Location: | 15 KM E OF COOLIDGE DAM |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Total length: | 87.9 ft. [26.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Owner: | Bureau of Indian Affairs [62] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 4 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
Average daily traffic: | 390 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 40.6 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,200,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2016 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | 390 | 40.6 |
October 2014 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 390 | 55.4 |
January 2012 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | 390 | 55.4 |
December 2009 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 390 | 55.4 |
June 2008 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 390 | 54.4 |
June 2005 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Fair | 390 | 54.4 |
March 2003 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 390 | 67.1 |
November 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 390 | 70.2 |
November 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 390 | 71.2 |
August 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 390 | 69.7 |
November 1993 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 280 | 71.3 |