IRR BIA RTE 3 over TWIN DRAW
Map
Coordinates:
+33.18994, -110.2904433°11'24" N, 110°17'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | IRR BIA RTE 3 over TWIN DRAW |
Structure number: | 00000000000H186 |
Location: | 27.6 KM E OF COOLIDGE DAM |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 40.4 ft. [12.3 m] |
Total length: | 82.0 ft. [25.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 33° |
Owner: | Bureau of Indian Affairs [62] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, posting recommended but not legally implemented [B] |
Average daily traffic: | 210 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 46.4 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,200,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 210 | 46.4 |
October 2016 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 210 | 46.0 |
October 2014 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 210 | 24.9 |
January 2012 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Satisfactory | 210 | 34.1 |
December 2009 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Fair | 210 | 34.1 |
June 2008 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 210 | 49.6 |
June 2005 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 210 | 48.4 |
March 2003 | Poor | Serious | Satisfactory | Fair | 210 | 46.2 |
November 2001 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | 210 | 48.4 |
November 1997 | Poor | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | 210 | 57.9 |
August 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 210 | 61.0 |
November 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 280 | 64.9 |