Share:

SR 89; FAP 025 over Kirkland Creek

Map

Coordinates:
+34.35340, -112.67950
34°21'12" N, 112°40'46" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SR 89; FAP 025 over Kirkland Creek
Structure number:00246
Location:19.7 mi N Jct SR 71
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:160.1 ft. [48.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.5 ft. [9.3 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1934
Year reconstructed:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,215 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:74.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
July 2017FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory121574.6
July 2015FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory134273.8
July 2013FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory170071.4
July 2011FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood170063.5
July 2009FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood172569.9
January 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood190069.2
September 2005FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood170070.1
July 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood163370.7
August 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood177565.9
June 1999FairSatisfactoryGoodGood156367.7
September 1997FairSatisfactoryGoodGood156368.1
August 1995FairSatisfactoryGoodGood130068.4
July 1995FairSatisfactoryGoodGood171667.0
January 1992FairSatisfactoryGoodGood120069.3