Share:

IRR I 40; S Frnt R over Cedar Point Wash

Map

Coordinates:
+35.24667, -109.29167
35°14'48" N, 109°17'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:IRR I 40; S Frnt R over Cedar Point Wash
Structure number:06353
Location:3.2 mi E of Jct US 191
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Total length:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2014

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:150 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.9

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
July 201496.9Good7 out of 10-150
July 201099.9Good7 out of 10-150
July 200688.9Good7 out of 10-150
August 200295.9Good7 out of 10-100
June 199895.9Good8 out of 10-100
July 199395.9Good8 out of 10-100
September 199195.9Good8 out of 10-100