Share:

IRR BIA RTE 248 over SOUTH FORK TULE RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+36.04328, -118.74058
36°02'36" N, 118°44'26" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:IRR BIA RTE 248 over SOUTH FORK TULE RIVER
Structure number:00000000000J190
Location:7 KM NE OF AGENCY
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:53.2 ft. [16.2 m]
Total length:56.8 ft. [17.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.4 ft. [4.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:Bureau of Indian Affairs [62]
Year built:1994
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:30 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:79.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$125,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
March 2017FairGoodSatisfactoryGood3079.7
January 2015FairGoodSatisfactoryGood3079.7
February 2012FairGoodSatisfactoryGood3081.7
May 2010GoodGoodGoodGood10075.8
June 2008GoodGoodGoodGood10075.8
October 2005GoodGoodGoodGood10075.8
October 2003GoodGoodGoodGood10076.8
August 2001GoodGoodGoodGood10077.9
October 1998GoodVery GoodGoodGood1578.8
September 1997GoodVery GoodExcellentVery Good1578.8