Share:

LAKE BLVD over RICH GULCH

Map

Coordinates:
+40.68294, -122.40332
40°40'59" N, 122°24'12" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LAKE BLVD over RICH GULCH
Structure number:06C0126
Location:IN SUMMIT CITY
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:7.9 ft. [2.4 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:48.9 ft. [14.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1970
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,024 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:87.5

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
July 2017Fair6 out of 10302487.5
July 2015Fair6 out of 10302487.5
September 2013Good8 out of 10302487.5
September 2011Good8 out of 10302487.5
September 2007Good8 out of 10180095.9
February 2006Good8 out of 10180095.9
May 2004Good8 out of 10180095.9
November 2000Good8 out of 10180094.9
May 1995Good8 out of 10180095.9
February 1993Good7 out of 10180095.9
April 1990GoodN out of 10180095.9