PORT WINE RIDGE RD over CEDAR GROVE RAVINE
Map
Coordinates:
+39.69243, -120.9279039°41'33" N, 120°55'40" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | PORT WINE RIDGE RD over CEDAR GROVE RAVINE |
Structure number: | 13C0052 |
Location: | 0.3 MI S INTX ST LOUIS RD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Total length: | 27.6 ft. [8.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1975 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 25 [as of 2000] |
Truck traffic: | 15% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
Sufficiency rating: | 69.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 25 | 69.4 |
September 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 25 | 79.2 |
September 2013 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 25 | 68.2 |
October 2011 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 25 | 68.2 |
October 2009 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 25 | 68.2 |
September 2007 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 25 | 68.2 |
October 2005 | Fair | Good | Fair | Fair | 25 | 68.2 |
August 2004 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 100 | 37.9 |
August 2002 | Poor | Good | Serious | Fair | 100 | 37.9 |
August 2000 | Poor | Critical | Serious | Fair | 100 | 23.2 |
August 1997 | Poor | Fair | Serious | Fair | 100 | 32.8 |
June 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 75.0 |
July 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 79.0 |
October 1990 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 100 | 79.0 |