Share: 
KING RIDGE RD over BIG AUSTIN CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.56104, -123.10214
38°33'40" N, 123°06'08" W
+38.56104, -123.10214
38°33'40" N, 123°06'08" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | KING RIDGE RD over BIG AUSTIN CREEK |
| Structure number: | 20C0433 |
| Location: | 2.3 MI N FORT ROSS RD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
| Total length: | 124.0 ft. [37.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.7 ft. [5.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1965 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2016
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 2010] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 85.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| June 2016 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 200 | 85.9 |
| June 2014 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 200 | 85.9 |
| June 2012 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 200 | 74.8 |
| October 2010 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 75.1 |
| June 2008 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 75.1 |
| July 2006 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 75.1 |
| June 2004 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 75.1 |
| June 2002 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 76.7 |
| December 2000 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 76.6 |
| August 1997 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 73.6 |
| September 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 85.3 |
| July 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 85.3 |
| April 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 85.3 |
© Copyright 2012-19, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1042800
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1042800