KING RIDGE RD over BIG AUSTIN CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.56104, -123.1021438°33'40" N, 123°06'08" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | KING RIDGE RD over BIG AUSTIN CREEK |
Structure number: | 20C0433 |
Location: | 2.3 MI N FORT ROSS RD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Total length: | 124.0 ft. [37.8 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 16.1 ft. [4.9 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 16.7 ft. [5.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1965 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 200 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 76.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 200 | 76.9 |
June 2016 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 200 | 85.9 |
June 2014 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 200 | 85.9 |
June 2012 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 200 | 74.8 |
October 2010 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 75.1 |
June 2008 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 75.1 |
July 2006 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 75.1 |
June 2004 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 75.1 |
June 2002 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 76.7 |
December 2000 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 76.6 |
August 1997 | Fair | Good | Fair | Satisfactory | 100 | 73.6 |
September 1995 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 85.3 |
July 1993 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 85.3 |
April 1990 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 100 | 85.3 |