Share: 
STATE ROUTE 128 over SAGE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.48928, -122.34887
38°29'21" N, 122°20'56" W
+38.48928, -122.34887
38°29'21" N, 122°20'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | STATE ROUTE 128 over SAGE CREEK |
| Structure number: | 21 0074 |
| Location: | 04-NAP-128-11.26 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
| Total length: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1945 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 2,125 [as of 2009] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 70.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| April 2018 | Good | - | Good | Good | 2125 | 70.9 |
| April 2016 | Good | - | Very Good | Very Good | 2125 | 70.9 |
| April 2014 | Good | - | Good | Good | 2125 | 70.9 |
| April 2012 | Fair | - | Fair | Good | 2125 | 48.9 |
| August 2010 | Fair | - | Fair | Good | 2450 | 47.8 |
| April 2009 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 2450 | 47.8 |
| April 2007 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 1230 | 52.0 |
| February 2006 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 1230 | 69.3 |
| December 2003 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 1230 | 69.3 |
| March 2002 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 1230 | 69.3 |
| April 2000 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 1230 | 69.3 |
| August 1998 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 1230 | 49.0 |
| April 1996 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1100 | 80.8 |
| July 1994 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1100 | 80.8 |
| November 1992 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1200 | 80.2 |
| December 1990 | Good | - | Good | Good | 1200 | 80.2 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1042923
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1042923