CHURCH LANE over SAN PABLO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.96199, -122.3363737°57'43" N, 122°20'11" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CHURCH LANE over SAN PABLO CREEK |
Structure number: | 28C0323 |
Location: | 0.1 MI S EL PORTAL |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 25.9 ft. [7.9 m] |
Total length: | 77.1 ft. [23.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 44.6 ft. [13.6 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1955 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 12,540 [as of 2010] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 85.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2016 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 12540 | 85.7 |
December 2014 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 12540 | 85.7 |
December 2012 | Poor | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | 12540 | 85.7 |
December 2010 | Poor | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | 11547 | 85.8 |
December 2008 | Poor | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | 11547 | 85.8 |
December 2006 | Poor | Poor | Good | Fair | 11547 | 74.6 |
December 2005 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 11547 | 60.2 |
November 2004 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 11547 | 60.2 |
December 2002 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 11547 | 60.2 |
November 2000 | Poor | Fair | Fair | Poor | 11547 | 60.2 |
November 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Fair | 11547 | 77.6 |
April 1995 | - | - | - | - | 11547 | 89.1 |
February 1993 | - | - | - | - | 11547 | 89.1 |
August 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 11547 | 89.1 |