RED WILLOW RD over WEST BRANCH ALAMO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.78739, -121.9240137°47'15" N, 121°55'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | RED WILLOW RD over WEST BRANCH ALAMO CREEK |
Structure number: | 28C0452 |
Location: | 0.1 MI SE DOUGHERTY RD |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Total length: | 120.1 ft. [36.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 31.2 ft. [9.5 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1990 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Wood or timber [7] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 700 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 60.4 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2018 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 700 | 60.4 |
June 2016 | Good | Very Good | Good | Very Good | 700 | 72.8 |
June 2014 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 700 | 71.7 |
June 2012 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 700 | 71.7 |
June 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 50 | 90.5 |
June 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 50 | 90.5 |
January 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 50 | 90.5 |
December 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 90.5 |
March 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 50 | 90.5 |
February 1996 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 90.6 |
February 1994 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 90.6 |
February 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 90.6 |