STATE ROUTE 49 over CALAVERITAS CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.16172, -120.6488038°09'42" N, 120°38'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | STATE ROUTE 49 over CALAVERITAS CREEK |
Structure number: | 30 0016 |
Location: | 10-CAL-049-16.41 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
Length of largest span: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
Total length: | 240.2 ft. [73.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 27.2 ft. [8.3 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1930 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 7 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 7,300 [as of 2009] |
Truck traffic: | 5% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 76.1 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $1,021,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2017 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7300 | 76.1 |
May 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Good | 7300 | 76.1 |
June 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7300 | 76.1 |
June 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 7300 | 76.1 |
June 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 6550 | 76.3 |
May 2007 | Poor | Poor | Good | Satisfactory | 6550 | 71.7 |
May 2005 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 6950 | 68.1 |
April 2004 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 6950 | 65.8 |
May 2003 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 7100 | 63.2 |
May 2000 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 6830 | 66.6 |
May 1999 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 6830 | 66.6 |
March 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 6830 | 70.0 |
February 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 8600 | 67.6 |
May 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 7600 | 68.9 |
September 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 7600 | 68.9 |