Share: 
STATE ROUTE 84 over WEST UNION CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.42525, -122.26719
37°25'31" N, 122°16'02" W
+37.42525, -122.26719
37°25'31" N, 122°16'02" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | STATE ROUTE 84 over WEST UNION CREEK |
| Structure number: | 35 0044 |
| Location: | 04-SM-084-19.89-WDS |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Total length: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1903 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main span design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 6,600 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 46.6 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2018 | Fair | - | Fair | Fair | 6600 | 46.6 |
| May 2016 | Fair | - | Fair | Good | 6600 | 46.6 |
| May 2014 | Poor | - | Poor | Satisfactory | 6600 | 29.8 |
| May 2012 | Poor | - | Poor | Satisfactory | 6600 | 29.6 |
| August 2010 | Poor | - | Poor | Satisfactory | 6600 | 29.6 |
| May 2008 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 6600 | 46.4 |
| May 2006 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 6600 | 28.0 |
| July 2004 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 6600 | 28.0 |
| June 2002 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 6760 | 27.9 |
| August 2001 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 6760 | 27.9 |
| June 2000 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 6760 | 27.9 |
| June 1998 | Fair | - | Satisfactory | - | 6760 | 39.6 |
| June 1996 | Fair | - | Fair | - | 8900 | 26.4 |
| June 1994 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 8900 | 7.0 |
| April 1992 | Poor | - | Poor | Poor | 8700 | 7.0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1047180
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1047180