Share:

N VAN NESS AVE over DRY CREEK CANAL

Map

Coordinates:
+36.75445, -119.79877
36°45'16" N, 119°47'56" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:N VAN NESS AVE over DRY CREEK CANAL
Structure number:42C0205
Location:0.2 MI S OLIVE AVE
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Total length:41.0 ft. [12.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:51.5 ft. [15.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:65.9 ft. [20.1 m]
Skew angle:37°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,900 [as of 2009]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:88.7

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
January 2017Fair6 out of 10790088.7
February 2015Fair5 out of 10790077.6
March 2013Fair5 out of 10790077.6
October 2011Fair5 out of 10790085.2
December 2009Fair5 out of 101020084.9
January 2008Poor4 out of 101020068.6
November 2005Poor4 out of 101020068.6
November 2003Poor4 out of 101020068.6
November 2001Poor4 out of 101020068.6
November 1999Fair6 out of 101020096.0
September 1994Fair6 out of 101020096.2
April 1992Fair6 out of 101020096.2