Share:

CO. RD. M4296 over W BRANCH OF CAYUCOS CRK

Map

Coordinates:
+35.48204, -120.92401
35°28'55" N, 120°55'26" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CO. RD. M4296 over W BRANCH OF CAYUCOS CRK
Structure number:49C0385
Location:1 MI NW CAYUCOS RD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Total length:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:17.7 ft. [5.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:55.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$119,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
July 2016FairFairGoodFair10055.7
August 2014GoodGoodGoodGood10068.0
July 2012GoodGoodGoodGood10068.0
July 2010GoodGoodGoodGood10064.1
October 2008GoodGoodGoodGood10062.9
August 2006FairSatisfactoryGoodGood10056.7
August 2004FairSatisfactoryGoodGood10056.7
July 2002FairSatisfactoryGoodGood10056.7
November 2000PoorSatisfactoryPoorGood10037.1
April 1998FairSatisfactoryGoodGood10056.7
April 1996FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10052.9
December 1993FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10056.0
July 1991FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10056.0