U.S. HIGHWAY 101 over MELROSE AVE
Map
Coordinates:
+34.08333, -118.2966734°04'60" N, 118°17'48" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
Name: | U.S. HIGHWAY 101 over MELROSE AVE |
Structure number: | 53 0673R |
Location: | 07-LA-101-4.85-LA |
Purpose: | Carries highway over highway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways (Urban) [12] |
Length of largest span: | 123.0 ft. [37.5 m] |
Total length: | 264.1 ft. [80.5 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 55.4 ft. [16.9 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 14.4 ft. [4.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 53° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1950 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Box beam or girders - Multiple [05] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2016
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 117,500 [as of 2011] |
Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Operating rating: | 72.7 tons [66.1 metric tons] |
Inventory rating: | 53.1 tons [48.3 metric tons] |
Sufficiency rating: | 65.0 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $2,289,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Suff. Rating | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | SD/FO | ADT |
---|
March 2016 | 65.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Very Good | FO | 117500 |
February 2014 | 65.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 117500 |
February 2012 | 65.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 117500 |
January 2010 | 65.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 117500 |
February 2008 | 65.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 117500 |
January 2006 | 65.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 117500 |
April 2004 | 65.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 117500 |
March 2002 | 65.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 136600 |
April 2000 | 65.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 136600 |
April 1998 | 65.0 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | FO | 136600 |
February 1996 | 67.0 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | FO | 112450 |
July 1994 | 67.0 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | FO | 112450 |
May 1992 | 66.8 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | FO | 114550 |