E105-N110 HOV over 105 WB & 110 SB, STS


+33.92833, -118.28500
33°55'42" N, 118°17'06" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:E105-N110 HOV over 105 WB & 110 SB, STS
Structure number:53 2682E
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:154.9 ft. [47.2 m]
Total length:4163.3 ft. [1268.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.0 ft. [6.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.9 ft. [15.5 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:17.1 ft. [5.2 m]
Skew angle:99°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:25
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:25,000 [as of 2006]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:59.5 tons [54.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:71.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$33,138,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
April 201671.8GoodGoodGoodVery GoodFO25000
April 201491.5GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO25000
April 201291.5GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO25000
April 201091.5GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO25000
April 200891.5GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO25000
April 200691.5GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO25000
April 200482.5GoodGoodVery GoodGoodFO-
February 200282.5GoodGoodVery GoodGood--
June 200082.5FairSatisfactoryVery GoodGood--
July 199782.5GoodGoodVery GoodGood--
September 199582.5GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent--