Share:

OLYMPIC BOULEVARD over BNSF RY, LA RIVER, UP RR

Map

Coordinates:
+34.02549, -118.22621
34°01'32" N, 118°13'34" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:OLYMPIC BOULEVARD over BNSF RY, LA RIVER, UP RR
Structure number:53C0163
Location:0.3 MI W/O SOTO STREET
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:99.7 ft. [30.4 m]
Total length:1422.0 ft. [433.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:56.4 ft. [17.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:69.9 ft. [21.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:19.7 ft. [6.0 m]
Skew angle:11°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1925
Historic significance:Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [2]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:27,728 [as of 2008]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:70.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$15,534,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
July 2016FairGoodGoodFair2772870.8
July 2014GoodGoodGoodGood2772882.6
July 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood2772882.6
October 2010FairFairSatisfactoryGood2772881.5
July 2008FairFairSatisfactoryGood2772881.5
October 2006FairFairSatisfactoryGood2772881.5
December 2004FairFairGoodGood2772881.5
June 2001GoodGoodGoodGood2390088.4
June 1999GoodGoodGoodGood2390088.4
November 1997GoodGoodGoodGood2390088.4
June 1996GoodGoodGoodGood2390088.4
April 1994FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory2390087.1
May 1992FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory2390087.1
March 1990FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory2390087.1

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beamlinear ft.2,6742,52415000
Reinforced Concrete Archlinear ft.3602907000
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Top Flangesq. ft.7,4547,00744700
Wearing Surfacessq. ft.7,45417,45300
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Columneach112526000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Walllinear ft.1721423000
Timber Pileeach11000
Reinforced Concrete Pier Caplinear ft.5574877000
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.8678521005