OLYMPIC BOULEVARD over BNSF RY, LA RIVER, UP RR

Map

Coordinates:
+34.02549, -118.22621
34°01'32" N, 118°13'34" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	OLYMPIC BOULEVARD over BNSF RY, LA RIVER, UP RR
Structure number:	53C0163
Location:	0.3 MI W/O SOTO STREET
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	99.7 ft. `[30.4 m]`
Total length:	1422.0 ft. `[433.4 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	56.4 ft. `[17.2 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	69.9 ft. `[21.3 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	19.7 ft. `[6.0 m]`
Skew angle:	11°
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency `[04]`
Year built:	1925
Historic significance:	Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[2]`
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 `[4]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main spans design:	Arch - Deck `[11]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	27,728 `[as of 2008]`
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	70.8
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$15,534,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
July 2016	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	27728	70.8
July 2014	Good	Good	Good	Good	27728	82.6
July 2012	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	27728	82.6
October 2010	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	27728	81.5
July 2008	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	27728	81.5
October 2006	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	27728	81.5
December 2004	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	27728	81.5
June 2001	Good	Good	Good	Good	23900	88.4
June 1999	Good	Good	Good	Good	23900	88.4
November 1997	Good	Good	Good	Good	23900	88.4
June 1996	Good	Good	Good	Good	23900	88.4
April 1994	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	23900	87.1
May 1992	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	23900	87.1
March 1990	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	23900	87.1

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	2,674	2,524	150	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Arch	linear ft.	360	290	70	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange	sq. ft.	7,454	7,007	447	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	7,454	1	7,453	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	112	52	60	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	172	142	30	0	0
Timber Pile	each	1	1	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	557	487	70	0	0
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	867	852	10	0	5