OLYMPIC BOULEVARD over BNSF RY, LA RIVER, UP RR

Map

Coordinates:
+34.02500, -118.22333
34°01'30" N, 118°13'24" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Name:	OLYMPIC BOULEVARD over BNSF RY, LA RIVER, UP RR
Structure number:	53C0163
Location:	0.3 MI W/O SOTO STREET
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	99.7 ft. `[30.4 m]`
Total length:	1422.0 ft. `[433.4 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	56.4 ft. `[17.2 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	69.9 ft. `[21.3 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	21.0 ft. `[6.4 m]`
Skew angle:	11°
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency `[04]`
Year built:	1925
Historic significance:	Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[2]`
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 `[4]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main spans design:	Arch - Deck `[11]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	27,728 `[as of 2008]`
Truck traffic:	2% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Operating rating:	71.3 tons `[64.8 metric tons]`
Inventory rating:	43.1 tons `[39.2 metric tons]`
Sufficiency rating:	70.8
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$15,534,000

Date	Suff. Rating	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	SD/FO	ADT
July 2016	70.8	Fair	Good	Good	Fair	FO	27728
July 2014	82.6	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	27728
July 2012	82.6	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	FO	27728
October 2010	81.5	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	FO	27728
July 2008	81.5	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	FO	27728
October 2006	81.5	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	FO	27728
December 2004	81.5	Fair	Fair	Good	Good	FO	27728
June 2001	88.4	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	23900
June 1999	88.4	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	23900
November 1997	88.4	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	23900
June 1996	88.4	Good	Good	Good	Good	FO	23900
April 1994	87.1	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	FO	23900
May 1992	87.1	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	FO	23900
March 1990	87.1	Fair	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	FO	23900