NORTH SPRING ST over LOS ANGELES RIVER, UP RR

Map

Coordinates:
+34.07006, -118.22586
34°04'12" N, 118°13'33" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	NORTH SPRING ST over LOS ANGELES RIVER, UP RR
Structure number:	53C0859
Location:	0.4 MI WEST OF I-5
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over railroad and waterway
Route classification:	Other Principal Arterial (Urban) `[14]`
Length of largest span:	146.0 ft. `[44.5 m]`
Total length:	682.1 ft. `[207.9 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	39.7 ft. `[12.1 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	48.9 ft. `[14.9 m]`
Vertical clearance below bridge:	19.7 ft. `[6.0 m]`
Skew angle:	24°
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency `[04]`
Year built:	1928
Year reconstructed:	1939
Historic significance:	Bridge is eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[2]`
Design load:	M 18 / H 20 `[4]`
Number of main spans:	2
Main spans material:	Concrete `[1]`
Main spans design:	Arch - Deck `[11]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	18,808 `[as of 2010]`
Truck traffic:	1% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Underclearances appraisal:	Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is `[4]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	61.1
Recommended work:	Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. `[35]`
Estimated cost of work:	$5,216,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
June 2017	Fair	Fair	Fair	Good	18808	61.1
June 2015	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	18808	73.7
June 2013	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Good	18808	62.2
June 2011	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Good	18808	62.2
July 2009	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	20000	73.5
April 2007	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	20000	73.5
April 2005	Good	Good	Good	Good	20000	73.5
December 2001	Good	Good	Good	Good	14700	74.2
June 1998	Good	Good	Good	Good	14700	74.2
January 1995	Good	Good	Good	Good	14700	74.2
January 1993	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	14700	74.5
December 1990	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	14700	74.5

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Closed Web/Box Girder	linear ft.	54	32	22	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam	linear ft.	1,325	825	500	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	2,515	0	2,515	0	0
Wearing Surfaces	sq. ft.	2,515	0	2,000	515	0
Superstructure
Reinforced Concrete Arch	linear ft.	177	100	77	0	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	32	32	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall	linear ft.	131	110	21	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	33	25	8	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	262	255	2	5	0
Joints
Assembly with Seal	each	164	164	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail	linear ft.	563	563	0	0	0