LA TUNA CANYON RD over HANSEN HEIGHTS CHANNEL
Map
Coordinates:
+34.23400, -118.3640134°14'02" N, 118°21'50" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LA TUNA CANYON RD over HANSEN HEIGHTS CHANNEL |
Structure number: | 53C1221 |
Location: | 0.I MI E OF SUNLAND BLVD |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Total length: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 65.9 ft. [20.1 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 86.0 ft. [26.2 m] |
Skew angle: | 11° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1966 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 9,910 [as of 2018] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 99.1 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9910 | 99.1 |
February 2015 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 9630 | 96.1 |
February 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9630 | 96.1 |
May 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9630 | 96.1 |
December 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9630 | 96.1 |
September 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 9630 | 96.1 |
April 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 16400 | 95.5 |
March 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 16400 | 95.5 |
May 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 16400 | 95.5 |
April 1996 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 16400 | 95.5 |
February 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 16400 | 95.8 |
January 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 16400 | 95.8 |
February 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 16400 | 95.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 32 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 200 | 190 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 153 | 148 | 5 | 0 | 0 |