VICTORY BLVD over LOS ANGELES RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+34.18650, -118.5296234°11'11" N, 118°31'47" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | VICTORY BLVD over LOS ANGELES RIVER |
Structure number: | 53C1369 |
Location: | 0.2 M W/O LINDLEY AVE., |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 80.7 ft. [24.6 m] |
Total length: | 400.9 ft. [122.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 74.2 ft. [22.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 85.6 ft. [26.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 56° |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1963 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 5 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 56,000 [as of 2005] |
Truck traffic: | 3% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 70.1 |
Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
Estimated cost of work: | $5,357,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 56000 | 70.1 |
December 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 56000 | 71.2 |
December 2011 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 56000 | 67.9 |
January 2010 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 56000 | 67.9 |
December 2007 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 56000 | 67.9 |
January 2006 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 56000 | 84.3 |
June 2004 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 56000 | 84.3 |
May 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 29100 | 87.0 |
April 1999 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 29100 | 87.0 |
June 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 29100 | 87.0 |
May 1995 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 29100 | 87.6 |
April 1993 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 29100 | 87.6 |
April 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 29100 | 87.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 1,342 | 1,342 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 4,600 | 4,600 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 3,190 | 2,784 | 203 | 203 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,756 | 2,756 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 187 | 175 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 93 | 81 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Other Joint | linear ft. | 161 | 161 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 55 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 55 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 244 | 244 | 0 | 0 | 0 |