Share:

RAYEN ST over PACOIMA WASH

Map

Coordinates:
+34.23177, -118.45918
34°13'54" N, 118°27'33" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:RAYEN ST over PACOIMA WASH
Structure number:53C2009
Location:0.5 MI E/O SEPULVEDA BLVD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Total length:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Skew angle:
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,320 [as of 2005]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:95.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
November 2014Good7 out of 10232095.9
November 2012Good7 out of 10232095.9
April 2011Good7 out of 10232095.9
November 2008Good7 out of 10232094.9
July 2005Good8 out of 10232096.9
October 2000Good8 out of 10-98.0
September 2000Good8 out of 10-98.0
July 1996Good8 out of 10-98.0