SR 39 (BEACH BLVD) over BREA CREEK CHANNEL
Map
Coordinates:
+33.87724, -117.9981433°52'38" N, 117°59'53" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SR 39 (BEACH BLVD) over BREA CREEK CHANNEL |
Structure number: | 55 0070 |
Location: | 12-ORA-039-15.83-BPK |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14] |
Length of largest span: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
Total length: | 44.0 ft. [13.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 84.0 ft. [25.6 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 96.1 ft. [29.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 99° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1925 |
Year reconstructed: | 1953 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 57,500 [as of 2009] |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 87.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2018 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 57500 | 87.3 |
May 2016 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 57500 | 87.3 |
March 2014 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 57500 | 87.3 |
March 2012 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 57500 | 87.3 |
January 2008 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53500 | 87.7 |
January 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53500 | 87.7 |
March 2005 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53500 | 87.7 |
March 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53700 | 68.1 |
November 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53700 | 68.1 |
October 2000 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53700 | 68.1 |
July 1997 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 53700 | 89.7 |
June 1995 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 50400 | 91.0 |
December 1991 | Good | Very Good | Good | Good | 50400 | 91.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 31 | 31 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 67 | 67 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pile | each | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 38 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 392 | 362 | 0 | 30 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 392 | 392 | 0 | 0 | 0 |