Share:

SANTA FE STREET over ROSE CANYON CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+32.81709, -117.22321
32°49'02" N, 117°13'24" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:SANTA FE STREET over ROSE CANYON CREEK
Structure number:57C0171
Location:0.8 MI N OF GARNET AVE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:91.9 ft. [28.0 m]
Total length:244.1 ft. [74.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Skew angle:17°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,465 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:65.5
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$1,295,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
December 2015PoorPoorSatisfactoryGood246565.5
September 2013PoorPoorSatisfactoryGood246565.5
April 2011PoorPoorSatisfactoryGood410058.0
September 2008PoorPoorSatisfactoryGood250065.5
November 2007PoorPoorGoodGood250065.5
November 2005FairFairGoodGood250067.5
July 2003GoodGoodGoodGood250068.5
July 2001GoodGoodGoodGood250068.5
November 2000GoodGoodGoodGood250068.5
April 1999GoodGoodGoodGood250068.5
March 1996GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good250068.5
January 1994GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good250068.5
January 1992GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good250068.5