Share:

68 TH ST over JAMACHA DITCH

Map

Coordinates:
+32.71002, -117.05089
32°42'36" N, 117°03'03" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:68 TH ST over JAMACHA DITCH
Structure number:57C0471
Location:420FT S/O IMPERIAL AVE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:49.9 ft. [15.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.5 ft. [15.7 m]
Skew angle:40°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1979
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,200 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:96.8

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
March 2017Good7 out of 10220096.8
February 2013Good7 out of 10220096.8
December 2008Good7 out of 10200096.8
October 2005Good7 out of 10200096.8
December 2003Good7 out of 10200096.8
October 2001Good7 out of 10200096.8
May 1999Good8 out of 10200096.8
November 1996Good8 out of 10200096.8
August 1994Good8 out of 10200096.9
June 1992Good8 out of 10200096.9