Share: 
RANGE ROAD over EL PIOJO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.85161, -121.16880
35°51'06" N, 121°10'08" W
+35.85161, -121.16880
35°51'06" N, 121°10'08" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | RANGE ROAD over EL PIOJO CREEK |
| Structure number: | DAPFORLIG000761 |
| Location: | N LITTLE OAK FLAT SEC 27 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Total length: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 10.5 ft. [3.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 15.4 ft. [4.7 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | Army [74] |
| Year built: | 1969 |
| Year reconstructed: | 2000 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1 [as of 2015] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Unknown [*] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 66.0 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $2,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| March 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 1 | 66.0 |
| March 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1 | 76.0 |
| March 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 1 | 76.0 |
| March 2011 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Poor | 1 | 47.7 |
| April 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 1 | 58.7 |
| April 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 1 | 58.7 |
| December 2005 | Fair | Good | Very Good | Satisfactory | 1 | 69.7 |
| June 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1 | 70.7 |
| June 2002 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Very Good | 1 | 70.7 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1063404
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1063404