Share: 
22ND AVENUE over LOCAL DRAINAGE
Map
Coordinates:
+39.74906, -104.77484
39°44'57" N, 104°46'29" W
+39.74906, -104.77484
39°44'57" N, 104°46'29" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | 22ND AVENUE over LOCAL DRAINAGE |
| Structure number: | AUR03.7-M.7 |
| Location: | 0.1 MI WEST OF TOWER RD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 8.9 ft. [2.7 m] |
| Total length: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 70.5 ft. [21.5 m] |
| Skew angle: | 5° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1981 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: October 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 875 [as of 2013] |
| Truck traffic: | 8% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 85.9 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| October 2017 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 875 | 85.9 |
| October 2015 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 875 | 85.9 |
| October 2013 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 875 | 96.9 |
| October 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 445 | 97.0 |
| January 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 445 | 97.0 |
| December 2007 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1030 | 96.9 |
| November 2005 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1030 | 96.9 |
| December 2003 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1030 | 96.9 |
| December 2001 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 880 | 96.9 |
| February 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 880 | 96.9 |
| February 1999 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 880 | 81.9 |
| February 1998 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 880 | 81.9 |
| April 1996 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 435 | 82.0 |
| March 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 435 | 82.0 |
| May 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 435 | 82.0 |
| May 1990 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 479 | 93.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Steel Culvert | linear ft. | 143 | 0 | 92 | 50 | 1 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 143 | 43 | 50 | 50 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 42 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 42 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1064342
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1064342