LAREDO STREET over HIGHLINE CANAL
Map
Coordinates:
+39.74254, -104.8004139°44'33" N, 104°48'01" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LAREDO STREET over HIGHLINE CANAL |
Structure number: | AUR04.6-K.0 |
Location: | .25 MI N OF COLFAX |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
Length of largest span: | 21.3 ft. [6.5 m] |
Total length: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 52.2 ft. [15.9 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,915 [as of 2013] |
Truck traffic: | 2% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 75.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
September 2017 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | 1915 | 75.5 |
September 2015 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Good | 1915 | 75.5 |
October 2013 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Good | 1915 | 82.8 |
October 2011 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Good | 1312 | 82.9 |
January 2010 | Poor | Poor | Fair | Good | 1312 | 82.9 |
December 2007 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 1816 | 93.8 |
November 2005 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 1816 | 93.8 |
December 2003 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 1816 | 93.8 |
December 2001 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 1270 | 93.9 |
February 2000 | Poor | Poor | Good | Good | 1270 | 93.9 |
February 1999 | Fair | Fair | Very Good | Good | 1270 | 95.9 |
February 1998 | Fair | Fair | Very Good | Good | 1270 | 95.9 |
March 1996 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Good | 1287 | 93.9 |
March 1994 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Good | 1287 | 93.9 |
March 1992 | Poor | Poor | Very Good | Good | 1287 | 93.9 |
May 1990 | Fair | Fair | Very Good | Good | 1344 | 95.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 324 | 24 | 250 | 50 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,295 | 0 | 435 | 860 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 104 | 55 | 47 | 2 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 50 | 50 | 0 | 0 | 0 |