Interlocken Loop N over W. Flatiron Crossing Dr.
Map
Coordinates:
+39.93054, -105.1276639°55'50" N, 105°07'40" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | Interlocken Loop N over W. Flatiron Crossing Dr. |
Structure number: | BFD-INTLE-W.FLT |
Location: | 400 Ft N. of Interlocken |
Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway |
Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
Length of largest span: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
Total length: | 153.9 ft. [46.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 37.1 ft. [11.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 48.6 ft. [14.8 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 16.4 ft. [5.0 m] |
Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
Year built: | 2000 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Prestressed concrete continuous [6] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 8,507 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 78.0 |
Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
Estimated cost of work: | $873,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 8507 | 78.0 |
January 2015 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 7483 | 78.1 |
January 2013 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 7483 | 78.1 |
December 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 19784 | 92.1 |
December 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 19784 | 92.1 |
December 2006 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 8129 | 76.0 |
December 2004 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 8129 | 76.0 |
November 2002 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 8129 | 76.0 |
January 2001 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 13000 | 75.4 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 924 | 924 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 7,500 | 7,350 | 150 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 5,713 | 4,570 | 0 | 1,143 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 98 | 97 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 49 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 97 | 0 | 0 | 97 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 462 | 261 | 200 | 1 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 462 | 262 | 0 | 0 | 200 |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 308 | 308 | 0 | 0 | 0 |