Share:

MARK DABLING BLVD over DOUGLAS CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+38.88932, -104.82658
38°53'22" N, 104°49'36" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:MARK DABLING BLVD over DOUGLAS CREEK
Structure number:CSG-G.36-12.48
Location:0.5 MI S GARDEN OF GOD RD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Total length:37.7 ft. [11.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:62.7 ft. [19.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1984
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,566 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Sufficiency rating:99.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
February 2016Good7 out of 10156699.9
March 2014Good7 out of 10156699.9
March 2012Good7 out of 10166299.8
March 2010Good7 out of 10166299.8
April 2008Good7 out of 10265599.8
May 2006Good7 out of 10265599.8
May 2004Fair5 out of 10265585.7
April 2002Good7 out of 10195696.9
May 2000Fair5 out of 10195685.5
October 1999Good7 out of 10195696.5
October 1998Good7 out of 10195696.5
November 1996Good7 out of 1084586.3
July 1994Good7 out of 1084586.8
September 1992Good7 out of 1084596.8
June 1990Good7 out of 1041396.9

Element Data

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2018 edition. This feature is experimental.
ElementUnitsQuantity1-Good2-Fair3-Poor4-Serious
Culvert
Reinforced Concrete Culvertlinear ft.2151645100
Bridge Rail
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Raillinear ft.7575000